New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Align auto-generated citation format with the GBIF.org website #2400
Comments
Thanks Marie. As far as I know they were aligned as much as possible not so long ago. Do you mean they should be exactly the same? |
The difference currently is the ending. GBIF:
IPT:
One of the issues is that GBIF citation is not applicable for non-registered resources. |
Thanks @mike-podolskiy90 I don't think we can add a DOI in the IPT citation. It make sense to align the authors listed, dataset title, year of publication, etc. I will close the issue. Thanks! |
I think they are still different, because the IPT does not include some contacts from the Associated parties with a role (originator and metadata provider as far as I know) that GBIF add to the final cite. And this is the autogenerated cite in the IPT, that is missing Geocol and Sanchez Rodriguez K A: The auto-generated cite in the IPT should include the same contacts that in GBIF |
Thanks @EstebanMH-SiB I'll have a look |
This issue was raised during the latest session of the technical support hour for nodes.
It would make sense if the auto-generated citation in the IPT matched the auto-generated citation on GBIF.org: https://www.gbif.org/faq?question=how-is-the-dataset-citation-text-auto-generated
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: