New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Elastic tabstops #288
Comments
If upstream Scintilla implements it, it's likely we may support it, but otherwise we won't. |
Still not implemented in scintilla |
This hasn't been implemented yet, not sure why it's closed. |
Because I set the pending timeout tag ages ago and there's been no activity since then. |
But it's not implemented yet, despite the several months of having a pending timeout label. |
So? Its clear to me that it won't be implemented anytime soon. Why keep feature requests open forever with no activity? |
Since this is dependent on an upstream feature request that hasn't seen any activity since 2014 I also suspect it isn't going to happen. But @kugel-, since setting your "pending timeout" label does not prompt anybody, you need to also post some text to tell those watching that you have put their request on a short fuse unless there is some indication of activity, so that they know about it and can object if they are still interested. It is unreasonable to silently put a target on the request without notifying anybody interested before pulling the trigger. |
See: http://nickgravgaard.com/elastictabstops/news/scintilla-implementation
Would be pretty neat to see in geany.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: