Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

the BLEU score of LeakGAN in COCO is about 0.84 #37

Closed
chenwq95 opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 3 comments
Closed

the BLEU score of LeakGAN in COCO is about 0.84 #37

chenwq95 opened this issue May 9, 2019 · 3 comments

Comments

@chenwq95
Copy link

chenwq95 commented May 9, 2019

The BLEU score of LeakGAN is far lower than that reported in the paper.

@Yaoming95
Copy link
Collaborator

What's your setting in the experiment? We use TF 1.4.
And how did you conduct BLEU evaluation? Do you use the evaluation program in the TexyGen?

@noobOriented
Copy link

noobOriented commented May 29, 2019

I think it is due to the default smoothing function.
Before nltk < 3.3 (released 2018.05.06), there was a bug in the SmoothingFunction().method0 (i.e. no smoothing),
which was the default smoothing function of sentence_bleu

That bug led to incorrect high values of BLEU for cases with no matched n-gram (common when n is high).

(See: nltk/nltk#1545)

Texygen uses SmoothingFunction().method1 by default: using 0.1 as the numerator in precision instead of 0 if there's no matched n-gram,
so it is unaffected by the bug regardless of NLTK version.

@khorshidisamira
Copy link

The BLEU score of LeakGAN is far lower than that reported in the paper.

How did you get the BLEU score?
Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants