Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Take cargo-geiger to the web #301

Closed
Vagelis-Prokopiou opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Take cargo-geiger to the web #301

Vagelis-Prokopiou opened this issue May 12, 2022 · 4 comments
Labels
rfc Request for comments

Comments

@Vagelis-Prokopiou
Copy link

Hi cargo-geiger community.

I am the creator of https://unsaferust.org. The reasons I created it are pretty match the same reasons you created cargo-geiger. So, I was wondering if we could join forces and take cargo-geiger to the web.

What I envision, is capturing the output of cargo-geiger (or a summary of the output) and show it on each crate's details page.

This way we can have a very easy and quick reference regarding the usage of unsafe per crate, and the the total usage of unsafe and all its dependencies, per crate.

I also intent to add a chart per crate, showing the progression (or regression) of unsafe usage over time.

Waiting on your thoughts :-)

@tarcieri
Copy link
Collaborator

What might be interesting if you were willing to offer it as-a-service is a way to generate a cargo geiger badge for your project, or an image-based report that can easily be embedded in things like README.mds

@pinkforest
Copy link
Collaborator

pinkforest commented May 12, 2022

Hi, I own geiger.rs domain and was supposed to launch it earlier but work got on the way.
See from major release tracker - #241
#102 (comment)
#150
#213
rust-secure-code/wg#43

You might also initially just want to scan -Funsafe-code or something or use the unsafe unicorn

@pinkforest pinkforest added the rfc Request for comments label May 12, 2022
@8573
Copy link

8573 commented May 12, 2022

I wonder whether it would be more practical to have this information in lib.rs, where it already shows crev reviews, rather than a separate website.

cc @kornelski

@pinkforest
Copy link
Collaborator

I'll convert this to discussion as this is not strictly cargo geiger issue

@geiger-rs geiger-rs locked and limited conversation to collaborators May 13, 2022
@pinkforest pinkforest converted this issue into discussion #302 May 13, 2022

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
rfc Request for comments
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants