Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Supergrid #138

Closed
Navids94 opened this issue Sep 18, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Supergrid #138

Navids94 opened this issue Sep 18, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@Navids94
Copy link

Hello,
Would you please let me know whether the threshold of 30 grid points for applying super grid is based on coarsest h (grid size at the bottom) or based on top layer grid size? I have considered four refinements, with h=347m for the bottom layer and h=21m for the top layer (basin)
Thanks a lot

@andersp
Copy link
Contributor

andersp commented Sep 18, 2022

It has constant physical thickness in all grids. And it needs to be at least 30 grid points in any grid, which means that the physical thickness is determined by the coarsest grid.

@Navids94
Copy link
Author

Thank you so much for answering the question.
Therefore, I have constant boundary conditions width(30gp*h(347)=10410) from the top to the bottom of the computational domain because I have determined the location of receivers, sources, and edges of the basin based on the number of grid points from the started point (bottom left ). As a result, it is correct to consider the coarsest grid(h=347) for determining the location of either receivers or sources.
I appreciate it

@andersp andersp closed this as completed Nov 9, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants