Skip to content

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Consider applying for support from OSGEO or OGC? #1168

Closed
Mec-iS opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 0 comments
Closed

Consider applying for support from OSGEO or OGC? #1168

Mec-iS opened this issue Apr 12, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@Mec-iS
Copy link

Mec-iS commented Apr 12, 2024

Hi, I am a geospatial engineer and I follow this industry since ten years now, beside being a contributor to Rust-based projects.

As geospatial package are most of the time mission critical and/or highly scientifically scrutinized, I was wondering if the leading contributors are considering getting in touch with major geospatial institutions to receive support for the long-term sustainability of this project. Some like me would like to have Rust in the geospatial pipelines but the lack of official "endorsement" is a big challenge to overcome.

For example I see OSGEO participating at Google Summer Of Code, it would be great to have this crate been contributed to with an organized effort. Also, another example, it is possible to apply for OSGEO UK funding that will allow more experts to contribute to geospatial Rust crates. I guess there are other initiatives like this to support the development effort.

I can consider helping in facilitating these processes if you think it is the way to go. Let me know.

@georust georust locked and limited conversation to collaborators Apr 19, 2024
@michaelkirk michaelkirk converted this issue into discussion #1173 Apr 19, 2024

This issue was moved to a discussion.

You can continue the conversation there. Go to discussion →

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant