Adding check and warning message for defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient

[jhuang2601]

What is the requested feature?
Currently, defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient needs to be defined separately in both the solid model and the BiotPorosity model for THM simulations. Different formulas might be used in different sections within the same xml file by end users. Sanity check is missing to protect GEOS from inconsistent or incomplete input.

Is your request related to a specific problem?
For this tutorial example, if defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient is missing in the BiotPorosity model, simulation results deviate away from the corresponding analytical solution.

Describe the solution you'd like
Sanity check and warning message are expected for defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient and related theory of BiotPorosity model should also be updated.

[sytuannguyen]

Indeed, they are two different coefficients both are required for simulating a THM coupling problem. Precisely, the defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient in the solid model is the drained linear TEC that related temperature change with strain in a drained free stress test while the one in BiotPorosity is another one for computing porosity variation due to temperature change in a drained free stress test.

I would propose to change their name and description a little bit to clarify that they are not the same thing. There is also another one in ThermalCompressibleSinglePhaseFluid that is the thermal expansion coefficient of fluid.

@francoishamon @jhuang2601 How do you think about rename them as: defaultDrainedThermalExpansionCoefficient in the solid model, defaultPosorityThermalExpansionCoefficient in the BiotPorosity model, defaultFluidThermalExpansionCoefficient in the fluid model.

[jhuang2601]

Indeed, they are two different coefficients both are required for simulating a THM coupling problem. Precisely, the defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient in the solid model is the drained linear TEC that related temperature change with strain in a drained free stress test while the one in BiotPorosity is another one for computing porosity variation due to temperature change in a drained free stress test.

I would propose to change their name and description a little bit to clarify that they are not the same thing. There is also another one in ThermalCompressibleSinglePhaseFluid that is the thermal expansion coefficient of fluid.

@francoishamon @jhuang2601 How do you think about rename them as: defaultDrainedThermalExpansionCoefficient in the solid model, defaultPosorityThermalExpansionCoefficient in the BiotPorosity model, defaultFluidThermalExpansionCoefficient in the fluid model.

@sytuannguyen Concur with you on such necessary update.

[sytuannguyen]

Indeed, they are two different coefficients both are required for simulating a THM coupling problem. Precisely, the defaultThermalExpansionCoefficient in the solid model is the drained linear TEC that related temperature change with strain in a drained free stress test while the one in BiotPorosity is another one for computing porosity variation due to temperature change in a drained free stress test.
I would propose to change their name and description a little bit to clarify that they are not the same thing. There is also another one in ThermalCompressibleSinglePhaseFluid that is the thermal expansion coefficient of fluid.
@francoishamon @jhuang2601 How do you think about rename them as: defaultDrainedThermalExpansionCoefficient in the solid model, defaultPosorityThermalExpansionCoefficient in the BiotPorosity model, defaultFluidThermalExpansionCoefficient in the fluid model.

@sytuannguyen Concur with you on such necessary update.

@francoishamon How do you think about this change?