Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Boundary condition refactor #63

Closed
rrsettgast opened this issue Jun 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Closed

Boundary condition refactor #63

rrsettgast opened this issue Jun 29, 2018 · 4 comments
Assignees

Comments

@rrsettgast
Copy link
Member

The initial conditions were recently refactored as part of the SinglePhase_TPFA solver development. The Boundary conditions should follow suit. Also, the Boundary Condition files could use some cleanup.

@rrsettgast
Copy link
Member Author

@klevzoff I think that we can greatly simplify the bc code by calling the lambda in the set loop. One of us should do this and hack out a bunch of code.

@herve-gross
Copy link
Contributor

Would be great to assign boundary conditions to sets of volumes/faces/edges/nodes (respective examples: aquifer/faults/wells/fracture tips).

@rrsettgast
Copy link
Member Author

@herve-gross Did you close this accidentally?

@herve-gross
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, my mistake! This definitely needs to be put on the queue of important features.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants