fix: more defensive code in KopytkoRoot #55
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
RadoslawZambrowski
requested review from
Borsuczio and
adamczopek
and removed request for
a team
pawelhertman
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2023
tomek-r
reviewed
Nov 7, 2023
tomek-r
approved these changes
Nov 7, 2023
bchelkowski
reviewed
Nov 8, 2023
Co-authored-by: Błażej Chełkowski <bchelkow@gmail.com>
github-actions bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 8, 2023
## [2.1.3](v2.1.2...v2.1.3) (2023-11-08) ### Bug Fixes * more defensive code in KopytkoRoot ([#55](#55)) ([6d640c1](6d640c1))
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 2.1.3 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What did you implement:
Closes #XXXXX
Added more defensive code to avoid warnings like this:
How did you implement it:
Check dynamicProps for invalid
How can we verify it:
Todos:
Is this ready for review?: NO
Is it a breaking change?: NO