Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plugin metadata #1656

Closed
naturallymitchell opened this issue Mar 7, 2015 · 2 comments
Closed

Plugin metadata #1656

naturallymitchell opened this issue Mar 7, 2015 · 2 comments

Comments

@naturallymitchell
Copy link
Contributor

In order to handle API changes in Pelican core, plugins should specify compatible versions in an additional metadata file.

@leotrs
Copy link

leotrs commented Aug 1, 2016

I agree. Recently came across one plugin that was generating empty <p> tags everywhere on my output, this wasn't documented and it looked abandoned. Finally had to write my own replacement plugin. If there was some metadata, it could have been clearer that it had little chance of working correctly.

This could even be done automatically: check the date of the last commit of each plugin and compare with pelican release. Add a last tested with pelican version <some_version> tag somewhere to the main pelican-plugins readme file.

@justinmayer justinmayer self-assigned this Jul 23, 2019
@justinmayer
Copy link
Member

Since the transition to namespace plugins is already underway, I think the question of plugin <-> Pelican compatibility can and should be addressed instead by specifying dependency requirements in setup.py or pyproject.toml.

I have converted several plugins to the new format and published them to PyPI, so this endeavor can be tracked by reviewing the plugins here: https://github.com/pelican-plugins

More discussion over at: getpelican/pelican-plugins#425

@justinmayer justinmayer removed their assignment Apr 30, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants