Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Skip ActiveJob integration if there is a better one #909

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Dec 17, 2019
Merged

Skip ActiveJob integration if there is a better one #909

merged 1 commit into from Dec 17, 2019

Conversation

fsateler
Copy link
Contributor

@fsateler fsateler commented Jul 6, 2019

When already_supported_by_specific_integration? returns true, the context and breadcrumbs are cleared by capture_and_reraise_with_sentry. This is wrong, because then the specific integration will report the exception with an empty context.

Bypass the problem by not doing the capture_and_reraise_with_sentry if we have a specific integration

When `already_supported_by_specific_integration?` returns true, the context and breadcrumbs are cleared by `capture_and_reraise_with_sentry`. This is wrong, because then the specific integration will report the exception with an empty context.

Bypass the problem by not doing the `capture_and_reraise_with_sentry` if we have a specific integration
@codez
Copy link

codez commented Nov 28, 2019

I am very interested in this pull request because we also see that no custom context is sent for delayed job exceptions. What is missing for the pull request to be merged? Is there something we can help?

Copy link
Member

@HazAT HazAT left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thx

@HazAT HazAT merged commit ff59e93 into getsentry:master Dec 17, 2019
@fsateler fsateler deleted the patch-1 branch December 23, 2020 20:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants