Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(integration): Ensure dedupe integration ignores non-errors #7172

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Feb 14, 2023

Conversation

mydea
Copy link
Member

@mydea mydea commented Feb 14, 2023

Currently, the dedupe integration will never drop non-error events, but it will still consider them as _previousEvent. Thus, if we have e.g. a sequence of events like this:

  • error 1
  • transaction
  • error 1

It will capture error 1 twice.

This PR fixes this so we only consider error events for deduping.

This may be related to #7147, although TBH I am not sure if this would really account for that many consecutive errors... 🤔

@mydea mydea self-assigned this Feb 14, 2023
@mydea mydea mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2023
3 tasks
@mydea mydea changed the title fix(browser): Ensure dedupe integration ignores non-errors fix(integration): Ensure dedupe integration ignores non-errors Feb 14, 2023
@@ -23,6 +23,12 @@ export class Dedupe implements Integration {
*/
public setupOnce(addGlobalEventProcessor: (callback: EventProcessor) => void, getCurrentHub: () => Hub): void {
const eventProcessor: EventProcessor = currentEvent => {
// We want to ignore any non-error type events, e.g. transactions or replays
// These should never be deduped, and also not be compared against as _previousEvent.
if (currentEvent.type) {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In these cases it's so weird that error events don't have a type....

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

jup, backwards compatibility I guess 😅

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

size-limit report 📦

Path Size
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 20.09 KB (+0.05% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES5 CDN Bundle (minified) 62.23 KB (+0.03% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 18.71 KB (+0.06% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - ES6 CDN Bundle (minified) 55.37 KB (+0.04% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 20.44 KB (+0.03% 🔺)
@sentry/browser - Webpack (minified) 66.81 KB (+0.03% 🔺)
@sentry/react - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 20.47 KB (+0.03% 🔺)
@sentry/nextjs Client - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 47.9 KB (+0.02% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES5 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 27.03 KB (+0.03% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 25.29 KB (+0.05% 🔺)
@sentry/replay ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 42.49 KB (0%)
@sentry/replay - Webpack (gzipped + minified) 36.89 KB (0%)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/tracing + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 60.22 KB (+0.02% 🔺)
@sentry/browser + @sentry/replay - ES6 CDN Bundle (gzipped + minified) 53.75 KB (+0.02% 🔺)

@AbhiPrasad
Copy link
Member

As a consequence, this might lower total event volume on the browser SDKs!

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Replay SDK metrics 🚀

    Plain +Sentry +Replay
Revision Value Value Diff Ratio Value Diff Ratio
LCP This PR f993317 77.43 ms 94.70 ms +17.27 ms +22.30 % 136.93 ms +59.50 ms +76.84 %
Previous e9eec27 67.47 ms 102.63 ms +35.17 ms +52.13 % 128.85 ms +61.38 ms +90.98 %
CLS This PR f993317 0.06 ms 0.06 ms -0.00 ms -0.40 % 0.06 ms -0.00 ms -0.49 %
Previous e9eec27 0.06 ms 0.06 ms +0.00 ms +0.07 % 0.06 ms -0.00 ms -0.33 %
CPU This PR f993317 13.02 % 12.92 % -0.10 pp -0.74 % 18.39 % +5.37 pp +41.25 %
Previous e9eec27 19.40 % 19.02 % -0.37 pp -1.92 % 25.44 % +6.04 pp +31.16 %
JS heap avg This PR f993317 1.94 MB 1.99 MB +50.92 kB +2.63 % 2.88 MB +940.45 kB +48.56 %
Previous e9eec27 1.94 MB 1.99 MB +45.82 kB +2.36 % 2.87 MB +927.84 kB +47.75 %
JS heap max This PR f993317 2.3 MB 2.55 MB +250.65 kB +10.89 % 3.36 MB +1.06 MB +46.05 %
Previous e9eec27 2.3 MB 2.55 MB +249.12 kB +10.82 % 3.35 MB +1.05 MB +45.46 %
netTx This PR f993317 0 B 0 B 0 B n/a 2.21 kB +2.21 kB n/a
Previous e9eec27 0 B 0 B 0 B n/a 2.21 kB +2.21 kB n/a
netRx This PR f993317 0 B 0 B 0 B n/a 41 B +41 B n/a
Previous e9eec27 0 B 0 B 0 B n/a 41 B +41 B n/a
netCount This PR f993317 0 0 0 n/a 1 +1 n/a
Previous e9eec27 0 0 0 n/a 1 +1 n/a
netTime This PR f993317 0.00 ms 0.00 ms 0.00 ms n/a 64.52 ms +64.52 ms n/a
Previous e9eec27 0.00 ms 0.00 ms 0.00 ms n/a 88.58 ms +88.58 ms n/a

Previous results on branch: develop

RevisionLCPCLSCPUJS heap avgJS heap maxnetTxnetRxnetCountnetTime
e9eec27+61.38 ms-0.00 ms+6.04 pp+927.84 kB+1.05 MB+2.21 kB+41 B+1+88.58 ms
d604022+58.83 ms-0.00 ms+7.65 pp+930.16 kB+1.05 MB+2.21 kB+41 B+1+109.63 ms
a961e57+54.75 ms-0.00 ms+6.50 pp+929.18 kB+1.07 MB+2.21 kB+41 B+1+92.73 ms
f7c0a2f+46.14 ms+0.00 ms+6.37 pp+921.47 kB+1.06 MB+2.23 kB+41 B+1+207.30 ms
cb19818+57.16 ms+0.00 ms+11.95 pp+1.07 MB+2.21 MB+2.52 kB+41 B+1+111.50 ms
ee301c3+71.07 ms-0.00 ms+12.64 pp+1.07 MB+2.22 MB+2.55 kB+41 B+1+94.67 ms
93c4759+61.10 ms-0.00 ms+12.72 pp+1.08 MB+2.19 MB+2.57 kB+41 B+1+116.75 ms
274f489+63.60 ms-0.00 ms+11.56 pp+1.08 MB+2.2 MB+2.56 kB+41 B+1+116.60 ms
4827b60+58.67 ms+0.00 ms+18.38 pp+1.07 MB+2.22 MB+2.6 kB+41 B+1+91.21 ms
c3806eb+79.85 ms-0.00 ms+12.10 pp+1.05 MB+2.16 MB+2.54 kB+41 B+1+93.58 ms

*) pp - percentage points - an absolute difference between two percentages.
Last updated: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 10:06:42 GMT

@mydea mydea merged commit f8047f6 into develop Feb 14, 2023
@mydea mydea deleted the fn/dedupe-ignore-non-errors branch February 14, 2023 10:19
ramchaik pushed a commit to ramchaik/sentry-javascript that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants