Sourcery refactored main branch

[sourcery-ai]

Branch main refactored by Sourcery.

If you're happy with these changes, merge this Pull Request using the Squash and merge strategy.

See our documentation here.

Run Sourcery locally

Reduce the feedback loop during development by using the Sourcery editor plugin:

• VS Code
• PyCharm

Review changes via command line

To manually merge these changes, make sure you're on the main branch, then run:

git fetch origin sourcery/main
git merge --ff-only FETCH_HEAD
git reset HEAD^

Help us improve this pull request!

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #4 (ae1da62) into main (5302eb6) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #4   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            3         3           
  Lines          100       100           
=========================================
  Hits           100       100           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 5302eb6...ae1da62. Read the comment docs.

[sourcery-ai]

Function TestJalaliDataFrame.test_jalali_groupby refactored with the following changes:

• Replaces an empty collection equality with a boolean operation. (simplify-empty-collection-comparison)

[sourcery-ai]

Sourcery Code Quality Report

✅  Merging this PR will increase code quality in the affected files by 0.05%.

Quality metrics	Before	After	Change
Complexity	0.00 ⭐	0.00 ⭐	0.00
Method Length	36.86 ⭐	36.57 ⭐	-0.29 👍
Working memory	4.21 ⭐	4.21 ⭐	0.00
Quality	90.42% ⭐	90.47% ⭐	0.05% 👍

Other metrics	Before	After	Change
Lines	64	64	0

Changed files	Quality Before	Quality After	Quality Change
tests/df_test.py	90.42% ⭐	90.47% ⭐	0.05% 👍

Here are some functions in these files that still need a tune-up:

File	Function	Complexity	Length	Working Memory	Quality	Recommendation

Legend and Explanation

The emojis denote the absolute quality of the code:

• ⭐ excellent
• 🙂 good
• 😞 poor
• ⛔ very poor

The 👍 and 👎 indicate whether the quality has improved or gotten worse with this pull request.

---

Please see our documentation here for details on how these metrics are calculated.

We are actively working on this report - lots more documentation and extra metrics to come!

Help us improve this quality report!