Optimization: Put grep -v empty task filter inside sed. #72
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
No need to spawn off another process for this; we can do this inside the sed command that joins the task numbers with the task text.
Note: The sed on OS X does not understand the \+ bound, only in the form of + when used with -E. Instead, I chose to fall back to the \{1,\} basic regexp, in the hope that it is very portable, and to avoid introducing extended regexps to the script.
|
Tests pass on OS X now. Thanks! |
ginatrapani
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2012
Optimization: Put grep -v empty task filter inside sed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Second try... I think I've found and fixed the previous issue that caused test failures on OS X (but could test only on the similar BSD).
The sed on OS X does not understand the + bound, only in the form of + when used with -E. Instead, I chose to fall back to the {1,} basic regexp, in the hope that it is very portable, and to avoid introducing extended regexps to the script.