You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Is there any value in including the extended description when selecting a commit to fixup? My preference for fixup commits is describe only what is being "fixed up". When I decide to squash (i.e. replace fixup! with squash! in the commit summary) then I definitely don't want the previous extended description. Maybe there are workflows that actually make use of these extended descriptions? If so, then it probably makes sense to keep them since deleting the extended description (Ctrl+a, Delete) is a lot easier than manually adding it in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I think we should remove the extended description from there. Only the subject line matters, and we should match what git commit --fixup <sha1> does by using just fixup! <subject> as the message.
Is there any value in including the extended description when selecting a commit to fixup? My preference for fixup commits is describe only what is being "fixed up". When I decide to squash (i.e. replace
fixup!
withsquash!
in the commit summary) then I definitely don't want the previous extended description. Maybe there are workflows that actually make use of these extended descriptions? If so, then it probably makes sense to keep them since deleting the extended description (Ctrl+a, Delete) is a lot easier than manually adding it in.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: