You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem description:
When opening a Pull Request it might happen, that the branch you want to merge from gets out of date. Therefore GitBucket offers the comfortable function to update the branch via Web UI. The merge strategy for this function seems to be "merge commit" always, no matter what you have defined as default merge strategy for the repository.
Since development teams normally commit themselves on a common mode of git usage it would be consistent when the merge strategy is also applied to the "update branch" function on the Web UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I would prefer to even have a completely detached configuration for this button, e.g. "update strategy". In our team, we use rebase to update our feature branches, but merge to get the feature branch into develop.
Issue
Impacted version: 4.34.0
Deployment mode: standalone app
Problem description:
When opening a Pull Request it might happen, that the branch you want to merge from gets out of date. Therefore GitBucket offers the comfortable function to update the branch via Web UI. The merge strategy for this function seems to be "merge commit" always, no matter what you have defined as default merge strategy for the repository.
Since development teams normally commit themselves on a common mode of git usage it would be consistent when the merge strategy is also applied to the "update branch" function on the Web UI.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: