Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract Settings to its own chapter #61

Closed
pmme opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 4 comments
Closed

Extract Settings to its own chapter #61

pmme opened this issue Sep 28, 2014 · 4 comments

Comments

@pmme
Copy link

pmme commented Sep 28, 2014

The detail in the documentation for the settings for Git Extensions is growing and Git Extensions is gaining more settings. I suggest that separating Settings to its own chapter would keep the Getting Started chapter at a more manageable size for new users. It would also provide ample space for writers to add as much detail as possible about the settings without feeling that they are making the Getting Started chapter too large.

@jbialobr
Copy link
Member

Yes, I fully agree.

pmme added a commit to pmme/GitExtensionsDoc that referenced this issue Sep 30, 2014
@pmme
Copy link
Author

pmme commented Sep 30, 2014

I've made the change and pushed to my repo but I haven't currentlygot sphinx installed anywhere to check that it links okay, so I haven't made a pull request yet.

@jbialobr
Copy link
Member

jbialobr commented Oct 2, 2014

You can also create your own read the docs account and set up a hook to build the doco from your private fork of GitExtensionsDoc. But installing sphinx localy will give you a much faster way to see how your changes translate to the final html.

@pmme
Copy link
Author

pmme commented Oct 2, 2014

Thanks Janusz, that's good to know.
Haven't had much time this last few days but I installed python and sphinx, and the new pages link okay so all ready for a pull request.

jbialobr added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2014
Extract settings chapter. Issue #61
@pmme pmme closed this as completed Oct 2, 2014
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants