Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How should the levels of government be laid out #75

Closed
nschonni opened this issue Oct 16, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

How should the levels of government be laid out #75

nschonni opened this issue Oct 16, 2013 · 8 comments

Comments

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor

Not to promote silos :trollface: but ...
There is currently a slight disconnect with US splitting between Federal, State, county, and City vs. the rest of the world.

  1. Each country splitting between levels (with separate h2's and grids?)
    • Country/Federal
      • Country A
    • State/Province
      • Washington
      • Ontario
    • City/County
      • ...
  2. Country as the high level
    • US
      • Federal
        • ...
      • State
@afeld
Copy link
Contributor

afeld commented Oct 16, 2013

While it's good to recognize this structure, I don't know that it covers the full range, either. See #21.

I imagine that, down the road, it would be nice to have some sort of tagging/filtering system for level, location, and maybe even focus of the organization.

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor Author

No, it's definitely not an exhaustive list, but just 2 possible top level headings. The civic hacker folks may want some distinct levels too ...
Maybe use something like DataTables for a sortable view http://wet-boew.github.io/wet-boew/demos/tables/tables-en.html#inisort

@jlord
Copy link
Member

jlord commented Oct 16, 2013

I'm definitely learning it's a lot more complex than how we organized it originally. Agree @nschonni that we may end up needing to make distinctions between civic hackers, too.

Let's keep watching as groups trickle in and definitely dream up a better way to showcase all the orgs.

@benbalter
Copy link
Contributor

Now's definitely the right time to start this discussion, although I'd think we'd want to hold off a bit before making any changes. The question I keep asking is "what are we trying to solve for?"

  • Help like-minded organizations to find each other
  • Help citizens to quickly and easily find organizations relevant to their location / interests
  • Make an extremely powerful graphic / statement about the strength of open source in government
  • Keep it as simple as possible for non-technical contributors to add their name to the list
  • (and don't want to promote silos as @nschonni pointed out)

I was thinking initially that top level should be country, and subdivide from there, but spaces + YML is going to be a big headache for the uninitiated.

Only reason US is split up like it is, is just because of size, which I immagine civic hackers may soon need to be split as well.

@smathermather
Copy link
Contributor

Added Special District in order to add Cleveland Metroparks, which I know isn't common, but we didn't fit in any other category. "Local" might be a more flexible category.

@nschonni
Copy link
Contributor Author

💡 like #101 we could add a folder with specific frontmatter

prose:
  media: "images"
  metadata:
    _orgs:
      - name: "layout"
        field:
          element: "hidden"
          value: "org"
      - name: "github"
        field:
          element: "text"
          label: "GitHub org"
          value: ""
          type: "text"
      - name: "fullname"
        field:
          element: "text"
          label: "Full Name"
          value: ""
          type: "text"
      - name: "description"
        field:
          element: "textarea"
          label: "Description"
          value: ""
      - name: "categories"
        field:
          element: "multiselect"
          label: "Org Type"
          placeholder: "Create or choose"
          options:
            - name: "Federal Government"
              value: "fed"
            - name: "Civic Hacker"
              value: "civic"
            - name: "City"
              value: "city"
      - name: "country"
        field:
          element: "multiselect"
          label: "Country"
          placeholder: "Create or choose"
          options:
            - name: "United States"
              value: "fed"
            - name: "Canada"
              value: "canada"
          alterable: true

I think using a JSON file for the Countries would make more sense https://github.com/prose/prose/wiki/Prose-Configuration#select--multiselect

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor

patcon commented Dec 6, 2017

Just to reopen this, how about this?

  • national federal level.
  • subnational[1] anything at state, province, in-between
  • local city, town, whatever. (h/t @smathermather 🙂 )

fwiw subnational is already used by Open Gov Partnership[2]

References

  1. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/553705/naming-convention-for-state-region-province
  2. https://www.opengovpartnership.org/subnational-government-pilot-program

@patcon
Copy link
Contributor

patcon commented Dec 6, 2017

And lastly, could be optional. array below country, the renders like current, but if it's hash, new render type

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

6 participants