New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update Julia syntax #5087
Comments
No probs. I've pulled this into v7.12.1 which I'm in the process of releasing right now. |
Thanks a bunch! Related: Do you have any pointers on how to run (regression) tests against GitHub's syntax highlighting pipeline? I'd rather not have to check lightshow for each PR... |
Unfortunately not. @Alhadis might have some ideas as he maintains a few grammars. |
The latest Julia grammar is now in use on GitHub.com. Current files are cached so their syntax highlighting won't change until there is a push to each repo. https://gist.github.com/lildude/13b6fe9e3afc45db47e801ec53984619 is an example of what the file you originally referenced will look like once the repo is reanalysed. Closing. |
|
The 0.20 release of language-julia has a critical bug that breaks highlighting for basically every file (e.g. this). This wasn't caught in our tests because those run with Oniguruma instead of PCRE.
0.20.1 fixes the bug (verified with lightshow), so it would be great if we could get a patch release to un-break syntax highlighting on GitHub without having to wait for month or so :)
Thanks and sorry for the trouble!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: