You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi everybody! I am writing this issue just to briefly let you know, that we simplified the description format of modules due to the reasons of better compatibility with further GUIs and real-time modulations.
I soon write all details in main section, but briefly you don't need to use 'd' and 's' operators in mapping header. The only thing you have to do there is to list all dependent tables, i.e.
;@ map table1 table2
On the one hand, it complicates the understanding of csd, because OscA [....], 440, [...] turns into something like OscA [...], 69, [...], BUT on the other hand it allows to usage of table opcodes inside of UDOs and you can modulate everything so easy now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, Alfonso! Sure, we continue our work, but there is a delay due to Eugene's shift to China and my preparations to thesis defense. I hope Xmas/NewYear holidays will bring new updates.
Hi everybody! I am writing this issue just to briefly let you know, that we simplified the description format of modules due to the reasons of better compatibility with further GUIs and real-time modulations.
I soon write all details in main section, but briefly you don't need to use 'd' and 's' operators in mapping header. The only thing you have to do there is to list all dependent tables, i.e.
;@ map table1 table2
On the one hand, it complicates the understanding of csd, because OscA [....], 440, [...] turns into something like OscA [...], 69, [...], BUT on the other hand it allows to usage of table opcodes inside of UDOs and you can modulate everything so easy now.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: