You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Decision from the 02 Sept 2021 release candidate approval meeting:
Enforce the rule that the TimeDimension is the last in the list of dimensions in the DSD.
It implies that the TimeDimension's 'position' attribute is redundant and should be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The dimension list was a choice of dimension/time dimension with a cardinality of 1..n (uniqueness constraint ensured only on time dimension could be declared). This will now be a sequence. I assume time dimension is optional. Is Dimension optional as well (i.e. could one have a DSD with the only dimension being time)?
@jgager it should be a sequence of:
1..n dimensions
0..1 time dimensions
Yes, time dimension is optional because of the need to support unit record data without any concept of time.
However, there should be a minimum of 1 natural dimensions I think because the REST API amongst other bits of the standard assume that. There is a change request to allow DSDs with 0 dimensions, but that has been deferred until after the 3.0 release because the impact is too great at this late stage of the release cycle.
Relating to public consultation issue sdmx3mdt/public-consultation#50
Decision from the 02 Sept 2021 release candidate approval meeting:
Enforce the rule that the TimeDimension is the last in the list of dimensions in the DSD.
It implies that the TimeDimension's 'position' attribute is redundant and should be removed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: