Problem separating definitions from examples in WNDB

[ekaf]

Release format
WNDB

Describe the bug
In WNDB 2021, the examples are not quoted, so it is no longer possible to distinguish them from semicolons inside the definition.

To Reproduce

For ex., consider data.adj in OEWN 2021:
00004137 00 s 01 moribund 0 001 & 00003913 a 0000 | being on the point of death; breathing your last; a moribund patient
"breathing your last" appears like an example although it is a part of the definition.

Expected behavior

Until EWN2020, the examples could be extracted, because they were surrounded by quotes. For ex., with PWN 3.1:
00004170 00 s 01 moribund 0 001 & 00003938 a 0000 | being on the point of death; breathing your last; "a moribund patient"

Additional context

In PWN 3.1, 2820 glosses had both a semicolon inside their definition, and other semicolons to separate examples. But with WNDB 2021, no parser can handle the corresponding cases adequately.

[jmccrae]

This is really a problem with the WNDB format as there is no distinction between the examples and the gloss, and the examples are not consistent in format. I have updated the export files to add the " back in, but depending on this particular formatting is risky. This also restores source information that was lost before.