Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Normalize short description and short examples #3

Closed
goodmami opened this issue Mar 8, 2019 · 5 comments
Closed

Normalize short description and short examples #3

goodmami opened this issue Mar 8, 2019 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@goodmami
Copy link
Member

goodmami commented Mar 8, 2019

Because we want the short definitions and examples to be useful for quick reference (e.g., on tooltips), we should ensure that the short definition is a single short sentence or phrase, not multiple sentences, and the example gives a single easy-to-understand example of the relation.

We should also normalize the way we talk about things, e.g., for hypernym we say "a word that is more general than a given word" but for meronym we say "Y makes up a part of X". We should be consistent in the way they are described.

Similarly for examples, for hypernym we have "animal is a hypernym of dog" but for meronym we have "hand/finger".

@fcbond
Copy link
Member

fcbond commented Nov 3, 2020

@glory please check the short descriptions and examples for consistency.

@gconnect
Copy link
Contributor

gconnect commented Nov 5, 2020

To ensure consistency, which pattern should be adopt for short descriptions and examples to be used across all relations?

Between which should be used;

Short Description : "a word that is more general than a given word"
or
Short description : "A makes up a part of B".

Short Example : manchester <ILIURL/83395>_ has instance_hypernym city <ILIURL/81847>_
or
Short Example : manchester <ILIURL/83395>_ has instance-hypernym city <ILIURL/81847>_
or
Short Example : manchester <ILIURL/83395>_ is an instance hypernym of city <ILIURL/81847>_

@goodmami
Copy link
Member Author

goodmami commented Nov 9, 2020

I think maybe this issue is superseded by #39. Shall we close this one?

@fcbond
Copy link
Member

fcbond commented Nov 21, 2020

Closing as the discussion has moved to #39.

@goodmami
Copy link
Member Author

It looks like Francis meant to close this. I'll close it now.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants