New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Optimize multiscope sync #452
Labels
performance
Something is too slow
Comments
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
…. Seems to slow things down but keeping in history as a reference point. See #452.
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
… loop is actually faster. See #452.
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
…ut into separate functions. See #452.
azonenberg
added a commit
that referenced
this issue
Jul 7, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The current multiscope sync code makes no use of dense packing or vectorization and probably has other opportunities for optimization as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: