You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Dec 4, 2022. It is now read-only.
I'd like to configuregroupAndSortGetterMethods and groupAndSortVariableTypes for grouping without sorting.
This would be nice for pulling together types that were accidentally put out of group, but still allowing a custom, logical sort within the group
Perhaps new settings could be introduced that override the existing ones. Something like a getterMethods setting might take one of: ignore, group, or groupAndSort. And also the same choices for a new variableTypes setting.
... it's kinda hard to find a good word for ignore (off, disabled, none, etc.) without making the setting something like getterMethodsProcessing.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the idea, @jibbers42 . As you pointed out, the settings are going to be tricky with this one.
I'll leave this open to see if there is more interest in this feature before attempting to develop it.
I'd like to configure
groupAndSortGetterMethods
andgroupAndSortVariableTypes
for grouping without sorting.This would be nice for pulling together types that were accidentally put out of group, but still allowing a custom, logical sort within the group
Perhaps new settings could be introduced that override the existing ones. Something like a
getterMethods
setting might take one of:ignore
,group
, orgroupAndSort
. And also the same choices for a newvariableTypes
setting.... it's kinda hard to find a good word for
ignore
(off, disabled, none, etc.) without making the setting something likegetterMethodsProcessing
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: