Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Clarify version #25

Closed
jstclair opened this issue Dec 1, 2014 · 2 comments
Closed

Clarify version #25

jstclair opened this issue Dec 1, 2014 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@jstclair
Copy link
Collaborator

jstclair commented Dec 1, 2014

I'm assuming we want to follow semantic versioning because we're down like that?

At least according to the spec, if you've got a version in production, you're already at 1.0.0. So perhaps we should bump the major of master to 1, and (when/if) we promote develop to master, mark that 1.1?

@gnab
Copy link
Owner

gnab commented Dec 1, 2014

editableCell is most def. in production, so I guess that makes sense.

@jstclair
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jstclair commented Dec 2, 2014

Gonna bump the version on master to 1.0.0. Then, if/when we merge develop ( #18 ), I think we should bump it to 2.0.0.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants