Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check >fdefs in ns, or provide something similar #28

Open
divs1210 opened this issue Sep 20, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

Check >fdefs in ns, or provide something similar #28

divs1210 opened this issue Sep 20, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@divs1210
Copy link

divs1210 commented Sep 20, 2019

It's not always feasible to write the entire spec inside the >defn, since the assertion predicates might be fairly involved and can end up being as big as the function itself.

Attempts to move it a little further from the definition via >fdef leads to it no longer being checked by ghostwheel.

It would be great if >fdef or something like it would be checked on (g/check).

@gnl
Copy link
Owner

gnl commented May 21, 2020

👋 Hi. I'm posting this same comment to all issue threads to just give a quick heads up that the project, despite rumours and some evidence to the contrary, is not dead. It was hibernating for a little while and now nearing the long-awaited next release, which will fix some long-standing issues (and introduce some breaking changes to the config).

I'll be reviewing all open issues and PRs over the next couple of weeks, so stay tuned and thanks for the patience.

See also this Slack thread

@gnl
Copy link
Owner

gnl commented Jul 20, 2023

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants