Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

HTTP Interface #69

Closed
marticardus opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Closed

HTTP Interface #69

marticardus opened this issue Sep 27, 2017 · 4 comments
Labels
good first issue Issues that are good for first-time contributors to pick up. help wanted Issues that could benefit from members of the community contributing their expertise or experience. type: feature A new feature or functionality.

Comments

@marticardus
Copy link

I would like to have a small web server that would allow me to execute the tasks remotely.

For example, sending a request to http: //host:8888/taskname would execute the task "taskname"

Like this basic example of dog: https://github.com/dogtools/dog/blob/master/examples/http-api/http-api.go

It would be interesting if the access was limited by a token / user

@andreynering andreynering added type: feature A new feature or functionality. help wanted Issues that could benefit from members of the community contributing their expertise or experience. labels Sep 27, 2017
@andreynering
Copy link
Member

andreynering commented Sep 27, 2017

Interesting use case. I didn't know similar tools had something like this.

I think this should be a separated project instead. It should be trivial to call the task executable with parameters + flags.

If someone decide to implement it, I could create a repo in the organization for it.

@zbindenren
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@marticardus
Copy link
Author

Hi, i found a similar solution https://github.com/adnanh/webhook

@andreynering andreynering added the good first issue Issues that are good for first-time contributors to pick up. label Mar 13, 2018
@andreynering
Copy link
Member

This is a very old issue, and I think this feature is a bit out of scope for this tool

The linked webhook is probably a better fit for this use case

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Issues that are good for first-time contributors to pick up. help wanted Issues that could benefit from members of the community contributing their expertise or experience. type: feature A new feature or functionality.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants