You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As this multiclient effort matures, it's important for teams to be on the same page regarding what is needed before we can do a public, coordinated testnet launch like the @prysmaticlabs' topaz testnet here. Here are some tentative milestones before a lighthouse+prysm public testnet announcement should occur:
No skipping or minimal finality delays for N epochs
Testnet resilience to recover under N epochs without finality
Initial chain sync stress tested
Stress testing N number of validators, where N in (16k, 50k, 100k)
Slashable events occurring and successfully caught by slasher
Major node panics/crashes resolved across both clients
High chain participation > 97% as well as good profitability metrics for validators (less critical as can be improved over time)
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
These points are looking sane. It still requires a lot of work for a long-term public multi-client testnet. Currently, Schlesi will probably either die or be reset every other week. Right now, it still requires a lot of patching and should mainly be used by client teams to nail down remaining issues.
Lighthouse is pretty good at supporting custom chain configurations, so it's easy to setup a couple of LH nodes with a Schlesi config. Unfortunately, there is no network config abstraction in Prysm that could be used currently. On my wish-list for Prysm would be either support for a custom network specification (yaml?) to override the default beaconChainConfig or a way to fully specify networks interally, i.e., having a --chain topaz and --chain schlesi flag. Could you add that to the list maybe?
Also, spec version is always a moving target and in case we would have to reset Schlesi or Topaz today, I would go for v0.11.2 instead of v0.12.0. This would also allow other clients that implement v0.11.x to catch up with these networks soon.
A realistic timeline for a public Schlesi launch would be >6 weeks at least, as I would carefully guess. I'm not sure what the timeline for v0.12.x looks like but I believe we will be still on v0.11.x in June. Correct me if I'm wrong.
Hi all,
As this multiclient effort matures, it's important for teams to be on the same page regarding what is needed before we can do a public, coordinated testnet launch like the @prysmaticlabs' topaz testnet here. Here are some tentative milestones before a lighthouse+prysm public testnet announcement should occur:
Thoughts?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: