Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task: Use ImageMagick instead of superfastblur #32

Closed
goodtrailer opened this issue Mar 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #82
Closed

Task: Use ImageMagick instead of superfastblur #32

goodtrailer opened this issue Mar 19, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #82
Assignees
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request project/core project/task

Comments

@goodtrailer
Copy link
Owner

Allows for other effects (e.g. vignette), along with a probably faster blurring algorithm (superfastblur isn't actually very fast, despite scaling well. Using a sliding window method would run faster and still scale linearly).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
dependencies Pull requests that update a dependency file enhancement New feature or request project/core project/task
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant