You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi,
For normalizing cifar100 dataset, you used (0.5, 0.,5 0.,5) for mean and std instead of (0.5071, 0.4867. 0.4408) as mean and (0.2657, 0.2565, 0.2761) as std which is more commonly used. Is this by design? and if so, could you please explain in brief, as to why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
This so that converting between [-1,1] (image for a neural network) and [0,1] (image for viewing) is easy. For problems such as adversarial examples, one often needs to convert back and forth frequently. It also does not make much of a difference to performance if one uses (0.5, 0.,5 0.,5) vs (0.5071, 0.4867. 0.4408).
Hi,
For normalizing cifar100 dataset, you used (0.5, 0.,5 0.,5) for mean and std instead of (0.5071, 0.4867. 0.4408) as mean and (0.2657, 0.2565, 0.2761) as std which is more commonly used. Is this by design? and if so, could you please explain in brief, as to why?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: