Getting all negative predictions when fine-tune my data

[yanfan0531]

Hi, I'm following the fine-tuning codes on my own dataset, which is a sentence pair classification task. All the parameters are the same as the example code. However, I get all negative predictions when doing the evaluation. Any ideas of what happened?

The code:

export BERT_BASE_DIR=/home/fy/uncased_L-12_H-768_A-12
export GLUE_DIR=/home/fy/glue_data
export TRAINED_CLASSIFIER=/tmp/ml_output/

python run_concept_classifier.py \
  --task_name=MRPC \
  --do_eval=true \
  --data_dir=$GLUE_DIR/ml_concept \
  --vocab_file=$BERT_BASE_DIR/vocab.txt \
  --bert_config_file=$BERT_BASE_DIR/bert_config.json \
  --init_checkpoint=$TRAINED_CLASSIFIER \
  --max_seq_length=512 \
  --output_dir=/tmp/ml_output/

The evaluation result:
INFO:tensorflow:***** Eval results *****
INFO:tensorflow: eval_accuracy = 0.64309764
INFO:tensorflow: eval_fn = 106.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_fp = 0.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_loss = 1.2086438
INFO:tensorflow: eval_precision = 0.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_recall = 0.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_tn = 191.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_tp = 0.0
INFO:tensorflow: global_step = 83
INFO:tensorflow: loss = 1.1816607

[monanahe]

Do you shuffle your data?

[yanfan0531]

Do you shuffle your data?

Thanks for reminding. I forgot to shuffle the data. I'll update the result once the model's trained on the new dataset. Thanks again!

[yanfan0531]

Do you shuffle your data?

The model performs perfectly after shuffling the dataset. Thanks! I am closing it.

INFO:tensorflow: eval_accuracy = 0.97306395
INFO:tensorflow: eval_fn = 5.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_fp = 3.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_loss = 0.13963467
INFO:tensorflow: eval_precision = 0.97115386
INFO:tensorflow: eval_recall = 0.9528302
INFO:tensorflow: eval_tn = 188.0
INFO:tensorflow: eval_tp = 101.0
INFO:tensorflow: global_step = 83
INFO:tensorflow: loss = 0.13657574

[tiru1930]

Even after shuffling my model predicting only positive i,e 2 column has high probability, My data set has question and answer pairs with their label, i,e label is 1 if question and answer matches ,else 0.

Am doing anything wrong here,tired with different sequence lengths

[anubhavpnp]

@yanfan0531 Does shuffling the dataset mean that all the examples of a class not be in a serial order ..i.e.all class o examples followed by all class 1 examples and so on. Instead we should have examples in train.tsv mixed e.g. few of class 0 and then of class 1 ,then few of class 0 and so on. Actually, my bert classifier is always predicting one particular class for all examples in test dataset and my training dataset examples are in a serial order, not mixed order

[yanfan0531]

@anubhavpnp Hi, you are right about the shuffling. You should try mixing the order of labels in training data, and it solved my problem.

[anubhavpnp]

Thanks for your help @yanfan0531 ..Shuffling solved my issue and bert is now giving correct predictions. I read a bit more and shuffling is usually a pre requisite for training a model in neural networks.

[adrianog]

How do we get probabilities [0.0,1.0] ? Do we need to add an additional softmax as per #322?

[anubhavpnp]

How do we get probabilities [0.0,1.0] ? Do we need to add an additional softmax as per #322?

I did not add any additional softmax layer..My bert prediction classifier is working fine.. @adrianog

[adrianog]

Are the probabilities returned for each class in the range [0.0,1.0]? Not even the example colab returns normalised probabilities.

[anubhavpnp]

yes..it is between 0 and 1

[adrianog]

Thanks for confirming. Is your code the same as on the example colab ?

[anubhavpnp]

I am using code which is here..https://github.com/winstarwang/rasa_nlu_bert

[adrianog]

I don't see any difference with the official google bert model function, so I'm not too sure as to why probabilities are not in the [0,1] range in the example colab... And in my code.

Relevant bits:

• Model Creation
• Output spec within model_fn_builder