Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

signalhandler_unittest tests fails on aarch64 #219

Closed
vielmetti opened this issue Jul 31, 2017 · 2 comments
Closed

signalhandler_unittest tests fails on aarch64 #219

vielmetti opened this issue Jul 31, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@vielmetti
Copy link

System under test is an aarch64 box (Packet type 2A) running this gcc:

gcc version 5.4.0 20160609 (Ubuntu/Linaro 5.4.0-6ubuntu1~16.04.4) 

I applied #50 , and all of the demangler unit tests passed. Now I am faced with this, the signalhandler_unittest failing:

hhvm@ed-2a-sjc-dcos:/home/src/github.com/google/glog$ make check
make  logging_striplog_test_sh demangle_unittest_sh signalhandler_unittest_sh
make[1]: Entering directory '/home/src/github.com/google/glog'
./src/logging_striplog_test.sh
In DBG mode; not checking strings
PASS
./demangle_unittest  # force to create lt-demangle_unittest
Passed 3 tests

PASS
./src/demangle_unittest.sh
PASS
./signalhandler_unittest  # force to create lt-signalhandler_unittest
OK
./src/signalhandler_unittest.sh
'SIGFPE' should appear in the output
Makefile:2065: recipe for target 'signalhandler_unittest_sh' failed
make[1]: *** [signalhandler_unittest_sh] Error 1
make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/src/github.com/google/glog'
Makefile:1908: recipe for target 'check-am' failed
make: *** [check-am] Error 2

In looking at this perhaps this is relate to #177 (fails on ppc64le) in some sense.

@Amazingren
Copy link

so, how do you solve this problem?

@vielmetti
Copy link
Author

@Amazingren I have not solved this problem myself, and the ticket is still open.

@sergiud sergiud closed this as completed Mar 30, 2021
@sergiud sergiud mentioned this issue May 6, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants