Stdlib list: Missing and Confirmed to be working as they are. #59
Comments
There's no way for others to edit your issue, so maybe this isn't the best way to track this? I was thinking a md file or a section in the README might be better, but I don't know how much PR noise that would create for @trotterdylan. A Google doc might be better, at least in the short term. |
I added a wiki page to track missing features. I think anybody can edit it. What do you guys think? |
I like the idea of having it on the wiki, but I think you're the only one with write permissions. I suspect we'd have to submit PRs to change it, which seems like it could generate a lot of noise. |
This is a good idea to use the wiki! I'll change my comment. |
Also should we for every .py file or lib include a link on the name? |
@ns-cweber It may be a bit noisy, but I'm willing to try it out. The reviews should be pretty low intensity. Feel free to request changes to the wiki. @luckcolors Links make sense to me. |
I'm going to close this in favor of the wiki page. |
You can contribute to this on the wiki by using this link
https://github.com/google/grumpy/wiki/Missing-Features
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: