You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
AFAIR, You have mentioned in encode.ru forum that HighwayHash passed SMHasher tests with better results than any other hashes. Can you please publish your results and SMHasher integratyion code?
I'm excited since it seems that even SHA1/MD5 doesn't provide results different than MurMur3/Spooky2/xxHash, i.e. all these hashes are indistinguishable from ideal hash as far as you meaure only with SMHasher.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi Bulat, thanks, we're working on it :) The ThreadPool dependency is already resolved, we're still thinking about how/where to release the revised smhasher.
AFAIR, You have mentioned in encode.ru forum that HighwayHash passed SMHasher tests with better results than any other hashes. Can you please publish your results and SMHasher integratyion code?
I'm excited since it seems that even SHA1/MD5 doesn't provide results different than MurMur3/Spooky2/xxHash, i.e. all these hashes are indistinguishable from ideal hash as far as you meaure only with SMHasher.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: