New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Documentation] Icons list #971
Comments
@martibenj I've made a very basic html page, with all icons from this file. |
Try this one I used this website for my android projects it's really helpful you can download any icon from this website and it gives you so many other options too. Note: theres an option for " EMBED HTML " you can find the basic html and image too |
Finally, I use this site : This project seems to be dead.... #1041 #1043 #1033 #1039 etc... |
Here are the list of 1537 available icons (font ligatures), extracted from MaterialIcons-Regular.ttf, as of 30-7-2020
|
The project did not receive update for more than a year. There are 1537 icons now instead of 1278. |
Hi ! Just have to wait for this project to resurrect at Google :-/ |
Hi! If it's not user friendly enough, feel free to create an issue (or even better, a PR!), as it's still a roughly coded website. Hopefully one day we won't need to create our own documentation tools, but in the meantime here's that. |
This repo was updated in #1055. #1068 added https://material.io/resources/icons/ should display the majority of the icons in this repo, except the ones that are supported by only a subset of the stylistic sets. Wrt download, I think you mean get_app? - https://material.io/resources/icons/?search=download&style=baseline. #1054 may offer helpful context into handling of this repo. |
Hello everyone !
Is there a documentation page that lists all the icons available (code name + image) in material design icons ?
I've found 2 websites but there are missing icons on both :
But both "file_download" and "unfold_less" works using material-design-icons...
Is there another site that show all the icons, or am I suppose to search icon on both ?
Thanks !
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: