New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add ability to batch Storage.create() requests #2351
Comments
This has been added to our feature backlog: https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-java/wiki/Feature-backlog . This issue will be closed but is linked in the backlog and can continue to be used for comment and discussion. |
Any timeline for this feature?We have a use case where we have to upload a number of small files to GCS and could do way better on throughput if this feature was available. |
This feature would significantly imrove our application performance. |
@yihanzhen please, is there any new ticket we could watch? I can not find any reference to this closed ticket in the reference Feature-backlog document and also no new ticket that could be related to this topic. We would also greatly appropriate this batched feature to radically speed up upload of several thousands small files. Thanks a lot |
Hey I no longer work on java libraries. I filed ^^^^ in the java storage's repo for current project owners to triage. Please follow it there for updates. |
Thank you very much for forwarding this issue to the correct place |
Seems like current batching API [1] does not support batching create [2] requests. Batching create requests might be needed for some use cases; for example, if a user needs to create a large number of small files.
If this is already supported it might be good to add an example.
[1] https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-java/blob/master/google-cloud-storage/src/main/java/com/google/cloud/storage/StorageBatch.java#L55
[2] https://github.com/GoogleCloudPlatform/google-cloud-java/blob/master/google-cloud-storage/src/main/java/com/google/cloud/storage/Storage.java#L1427
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: