Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(google-cloud-datastore): Add support for operators "!=", "in" and "not_in" in datastore #18401

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
Jun 28, 2022

Conversation

SandeepTuniki
Copy link
Contributor

closes: http://b/235907386 (internal)

@SandeepTuniki SandeepTuniki changed the title Add support for operators "!=", "in" and "not_in" in datastore feat(google-cloud-datastore): Add support for operators "!=", "in" and "not_in" in datastore Jun 21, 2022
@SandeepTuniki SandeepTuniki marked this pull request as ready for review June 23, 2022 05:21
@SandeepTuniki SandeepTuniki requested a review from a team as a code owner June 23, 2022 05:21
@SandeepTuniki
Copy link
Contributor Author

The failing unit tests are related to the minitest regression. Need to fix them separately for Datastore.

Copy link
Member

@dazuma dazuma left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you don't want to fix the minitest regression first, try setting the environment variable MT_KWARGS_HACK to 1 during the test (and then unsetting it afterward so it doesn't interfere with tests for other libraries). You should be able to do that in the :ci rake task; just use an ensure block to make sure it gets unset afterward. That should (we hope) revert to the old minitest behavior for this library's tests. (Also, of course include a comment saying why it's there and that it should be removed when the tests are fixed.)

@SandeepTuniki
Copy link
Contributor Author

The minitest regression for datastore is fixed in #18423. This PR should be merged only after #18423 is merged with main.

Copy link
Contributor

@bajajneha27 bajajneha27 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants