Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

docs: Update documentation to be clearer on pseudo-directory pitfalls #980

Merged
merged 4 commits into from Aug 9, 2022

Conversation

sydney-munro
Copy link
Contributor

@sydney-munro sydney-munro commented Aug 8, 2022

Thank you for opening a Pull Request! Before submitting your PR, there are a few things you can do to make sure it goes smoothly:

  • Make sure to open an issue as a bug/issue before writing your code! That way we can discuss the change, evaluate designs, and agree on the general idea
  • Ensure the tests and linter pass
  • Code coverage does not decrease (if any source code was changed)
  • Appropriate docs were updated (if necessary)

Fixes #859 ☕️

If you write sample code, please follow the samples format.

@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added size: s Pull request size is small. api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage-nio API. labels Aug 8, 2022
@sydney-munro sydney-munro changed the title Pseudo doc update docs: Update documentation to be clearer on pseudo-directory pitfalls Aug 8, 2022
@sydney-munro sydney-munro marked this pull request as ready for review August 9, 2022 18:26
@sydney-munro sydney-munro requested review from a team as code owners August 9, 2022 18:26
.readme-partials.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@sydney-munro sydney-munro merged commit 5f6ac74 into main Aug 9, 2022
@sydney-munro sydney-munro deleted the pseudo-doc-update branch August 9, 2022 21:41
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
api: storage Issues related to the googleapis/java-storage-nio API. size: s Pull request size is small.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent behavior in Files.exists()
2 participants