Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jul 13, 2023. It is now read-only.

Interest in supporting custom endpoints #53

Closed
rmanyari opened this issue Mar 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Interest in supporting custom endpoints #53

rmanyari opened this issue Mar 15, 2018 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
api: compute Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-compute API. status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.

Comments

@rmanyari
Copy link

Now that big codebase split seems to be completed I was wondering if there's interest in supporting custom endpoints as discussed in 1630 and implemented in 2548

I'm particularly interested in the compute module since it's the one we use heavily. If it's the case, I can get a PR ready in the next few days.

Rodrigo

@stephenplusplus
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, let's go for it! I think we need to get a clear goal in googleapis/google-cloud-node#1630 before we start, so let's put this on hold while we discuss.

@stephenplusplus stephenplusplus added status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. type: enhancement labels Mar 15, 2018
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith added type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design. and removed type: enhancement labels Dec 21, 2018
@JustinBeckwith
Copy link
Contributor

Good news! This was added in 49c5384.

@google-cloud-label-sync google-cloud-label-sync bot added the api: compute Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-compute API. label Jan 31, 2020
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith self-assigned this Feb 1, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
api: compute Issues related to the googleapis/nodejs-compute API. status: blocked Resolving the issue is dependent on other work. type: feature request ‘Nice-to-have’ improvement, new feature or different behavior or design.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants