Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: async should be dependency #743

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2019
Merged

fix: async should be dependency #743

merged 1 commit into from
Jun 14, 2019

Conversation

bcoe
Copy link
Contributor

@bcoe bcoe commented Jun 14, 2019

No description provided.

@googlebot googlebot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Jun 14, 2019
@bcoe bcoe requested a review from JustinBeckwith June 14, 2019 17:56
@JustinBeckwith JustinBeckwith merged commit e542b8b into master Jun 14, 2019
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 14, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #743 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #743   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.79%   96.79%           
=======================================
  Files           9        9           
  Lines        1156     1156           
  Branches      296      296           
=======================================
  Hits         1119     1119           
  Misses          9        9           
  Partials       28       28

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 29427ae...caffa98. Read the comment docs.

@stephenplusplus stephenplusplus deleted the fix-async branch November 26, 2019 12:20
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants