Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

type enum layout is broken in extension docs #41

Open
myakura opened this issue Jul 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

type enum layout is broken in extension docs #41

myakura opened this issue Jul 2, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels
bug Something isn't working extensions-reference

Comments

@myakura
Copy link

myakura commented Jul 2, 2022

Describe the bug
there are line breaks between each types enum in the extension API docs, and that's hard to read.

To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:

  1. Go to https://developer.chrome.com/docs/extensions/reference/history/#type-TransitionType
  2. Look at the types below the paragraph "The transition type for this visit from its referrer."

Expected behavior
Types are listed in a single paragraph.

Screenshots
If applicable, add screenshots to help explain your problem.

screenshot

Desktop (please complete the following information):

  • confirmed in Chrome/Firefox on Windows/macOS

Smartphone (please complete the following information):

  • haven't checked
@myakura myakura added the bug Something isn't working label Jul 2, 2022
@jpmedley jpmedley transferred this issue from GoogleChrome/developer.chrome.com Nov 28, 2022
@jpmedley
Copy link

This also needs to be rendered in a way that does not include the extra quote graphic.

@jpmedley
Copy link

The ticket link that jut appeared pointed out that this issue is probably happening because the correct processing code isn't being called. We may have a solution for this soon. Stay tuned.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working extensions-reference
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants