Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop transpilation for chrome extension #59

Closed
paulirish opened this issue Mar 23, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Drop transpilation for chrome extension #59

paulirish opened this issue Mar 23, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@paulirish
Copy link
Member

We may want to get rid of the transpilation to make dev a bit more sane.

I'm curious about using https://github.com/JamesMGreene/breq (require() polyfill via sync xhr).

Thoughts?


(Unrelatedly, doing the work in the background page will be easier to debug than doing it in popup.html).

@paullewis
Copy link
Contributor

Yeah, I think the only thing we need transpilation for is the require step, so I'd be game for us switching it out.

@paulirish
Copy link
Member Author

imagine the headlines when they realize that the performance advocates rely on synchronous network calls. 👅

@samccone
Copy link
Contributor

I think it might look something like this

image

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants