You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Trying to wrap my head around the new glyphsets tool. I looked in the /data/results .glyphs files but many of the unencoded glyphs from the previous glyph sets are missing, for example in GF_Latin_Plus.glyphs, the sets of numerals (*.tf *.numr, *.dnom) are no longer there.
Should I just refer to the archived .glyphs character sets for now?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The changes should have been preserved. I'll investigate this. This looks like a mistake. There may be more glyphs missing from other glyphsets, so I'll go over them one by one another time.
I found missing unencoded glyphs for Latin_Plus and Latin_Vietnamese and added them back.
Thanks for catching that.
I won't publish a new package right away as I'm about to make more changes, but the updated files are now available in the /data/results folder.
Trying to wrap my head around the new glyphsets tool. I looked in the /data/results .glyphs files but many of the unencoded glyphs from the previous glyph sets are missing, for example in GF_Latin_Plus.glyphs, the sets of numerals (*.tf *.numr, *.dnom) are no longer there.
Should I just refer to the archived .glyphs character sets for now?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: