Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Google fonts monochrome release missing 15.1? #464

Closed
forresto opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 7 comments
Closed

Google fonts monochrome release missing 15.1? #464

forresto opened this issue Apr 15, 2024 · 7 comments

Comments

@forresto
Copy link

forresto commented Apr 15, 2024

Related: upvote this issue: google/fonts#7558


I've noticed that 15.1 emoji that work in color:

image

Don't work in monochrome:

image

Is the Google fonts release behind?

Example Noto Emoji v47 font link.

@wdymThisIsntAvailable
Copy link

yea apparently it used to have it on September and it got removed a month later. I downloaded the font before noto b&w downgraded to 15.0

@forresto
Copy link
Author

@bsoap-cat do you happen to have the 15.1 file? I'd like to poke it for my own experiments, and can't find that version.

@wdymThisIsntAvailable
Copy link

here's the entire zip file if you want it
Noto_Emoji.zip

@forresto
Copy link
Author

Yes, thank you. That font file has version 3.002 whereas the version live on Google fonts now has 2.001.

@forresto
Copy link
Author

forresto commented Apr 22, 2024

That font file (3.002) is missing these right-facing variations, which do exist in Noto Color Emoji. According to my source of emoji data, these are the only 15.1 ones that are missing.

👨‍🦯‍➡️👨‍🦼‍➡️👨‍🦽‍➡️👩‍🦯‍➡️👩‍🦼‍➡️👩‍🦽‍➡️🧑‍🦯‍➡️🧑‍🦼‍➡️🧑‍🦽‍➡️

@wdymThisIsntAvailable
Copy link

The latest version of the font got re-added
Link

@rsheeter
Copy link
Contributor

Apologies for the inconvenience, fixed along with google/fonts#7558

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants