You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We're adding coverage to an existing project, and many files are not covered. Since the coverage json generated from the instrumented code essentially reports 'undefined' for files that weren't touched during the testing, our coverage stats are inaccurate (i.e. way too high).
My proposal is to provide an option in the instrument CLI to generate a 'coverage-baseline.json' file for the files instrumented, such that if you ran a report on the generated file, you'd see all the files, with 0% coverage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We're adding coverage to an existing project, and many files are not covered. Since the coverage json generated from the instrumented code essentially reports 'undefined' for files that weren't touched during the testing, our coverage stats are inaccurate (i.e. way too high).
My proposal is to provide an option in the instrument CLI to generate a 'coverage-baseline.json' file for the files instrumented, such that if you ran a report on the generated file, you'd see all the files, with 0% coverage.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: