New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

More implicit operators to be used as Sign Distance Funcions #161

Open

jagbarcelo opened this issue May 25, 2021 · 0 comments

jagbarcelo commented May 25, 2021 •

edited

Loading

As described in http://www.gradientspace.com/tutorials/2018/2/20/implicit-surface-modeling, in the section for Boolean Operators, it would be very useful to have more primitives like the ones already implemented: ImplicitSphere3d() and ImplicitBox3d(). In particular, I am thinking about:

ImplicitCylinder3d
ImplicitCone3d
ImplicitTorus3d (maybe?)

Are there, by any chance, any plan for doing them? At least the Cylinder would great. Thanks.

Edit: Some of them (and many more) are already implemented in http://mercury.sexy/hg_sdf/ and https://www.iquilezles.org/www/articles/distfunctions/distfunctions.htm

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment