We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I think having yyyy-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss.S'Z' as a default format is problematic.
yyyy-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss.S'Z'
Separate but related, we probably should include in the defaults formats like yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSX in the list of defaults.
yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSX
Related to #9367.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@jeffbrown Is this going into 3.1 or is it delayed until 3.2?
Sorry, something went wrong.
@Schlogen Per our discussion this evening, would you go ahead and add whatever defaults you think is reasonable and we can include that in 3.2?
jameskleeh
No branches or pull requests
I think having
yyyy-MM-dd'T'hh:mm:ss.S'Z'
as a default format is problematic.Separate but related, we probably should include in the defaults formats like
yyyy-MM-dd'T'HH:mm:ss.SSSX
in the list of defaults.Related to #9367.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: