Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Nov 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Run Ostrom's playbook #1168

Closed
chadwhitacre opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 1 comment
Closed

Run Ostrom's playbook #1168

chadwhitacre opened this issue Sep 19, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor

From slack:

I’m thinking about how to make a real dent in the problem (the problem: https://gratipay.news/open-source-captures-almost-none-of-the-value-it-creates-9015eb7e293e).
The problem is the tragedy of the open source commons.
Appropriators appropriating without supporting provisioners provisioning.
“Appropriators” and “provisioners” are Ostrom’s terms for consumers and producers.
If we really believe that there is an open source tragedy of the commons happening,
and we are really trying to solve that problem,
then Ostrom is our blueprint.
https://twitter.com/Gratipay/status/908710955265220611
boundaries, adaptation, democracy
monitoring, sanctions, courts
recognition, nesting
tl;dr I’m not sure how this problem gets solved without some “toothy” institution.
Basically https://github.com/ossfriendly/open-source-sponsors but with more oomph behind it.
One Ring to Rule Them All.
A single institution that accepts dues from member organizations in exchange for a “We pay for open source” stamp of approval.
The stamp of approval needs to matter in hiring (and possibly purchasing) for this to work.
A club.
An association.
A cabal.
A coalition.
A cooperative.
A trade association.
An organization.
An institution.
An entity.
A collective.
A group.
A bloc.
A fellowship.
A pact.
A society.
A consortium!
A consortium.

This was referenced Sep 19, 2017
@chadwhitacre
Copy link
Contributor Author

"Unite the tribes"

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant