New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
highway=proposed should not be drawn like highway=construction without construction=* #826
Comments
I like the fainter rendering, the first time I came across this it confused me: I knew there wasn't a road or anything being built so had no idea what it was. Just to throw it out there, is it suitable to be rendered in a general purpose map, before ground is broken, etc? Are there other discussions of the value of the tag? Even the wiki article discourages the use of the tag except for 'exceptional circumstances' and subject to discussion, which doesn't clearly explain a real world scenario or use case well! |
I'd also prefer a fainter rendering. Problem with this solution and also the solutions proposed in #345 is the missing |
It's good to have the proposals in the OSM data, but I'd also favour less prominent rendering. |
Having read through the discussion on #345 it seems like a better place for this. |
I agree proposed should not render like construction. |
Also we don't have the constructin key so we can't let the rendering depend on the type of construction road, at the moment. |
We do have |
Sorry, that's what I meant. |
The tag highway=proposed is currently drawn like highway=construction without construction=*.
For a nicer look, highway=proposed could be rendered with dashed outline of the proposed=* highway-type tag. Example rendering: https://trac.openstreetmap.org/attachment/ticket/2768/proposed.png
See also https://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2768.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: